That’s the word anyway.
Why, you ask?
There are more than enough reasons. Especially were the Clintons the shining example of what defines monogamous, married, moral mates… but of course they’re not. Not even close.
And yes, Anthony Weiner has been spanked twice for sexting, the second time after he swore he’d stopped and had gotten “treatment” for his “disorder.” The newest damage, according to Hillary insiders was Weiner’s embarrassing loss of the New York Mayor’s race. And of course there was the middle finger flip off he gave the crowd as he drove away from his defeat party.
So it makes perfect sense to me, how about you?
Hillary has suffered through a bevy of, uh, beauties who pursued and bedded her hubby; Monica, Jennifer Flowers, the abuse of perfectly good cigars and panties, accused rape charges, the list goes on.
Yeah, I can understand how Weiner flipping people off could be a deal breaker for Hillary; that’s got to be highly objectionable moral behavior in her world, huh?
I’ve searched for the proper words to describe Hillary’s “it’s us or him” demand.
Hypocritical or disingenuous don’t quite get it done. Because as we all know, there are no standards in politics. There are no black and white lines. What’s good for the gander is hardly ever good for the goose.
What the Clintons have apparently found most egregious is the comparison of the Weiner’s marriage to their own when the media says Huma, too, is “standing by her man” just like Hillary did.
The Dangers aren’t the same as the Royal Family, they’re different.
And, I’d assume they’re correct.
Jennifer Flowers wants to do a major network sit down and tell her story beyond what she had in her earlier book. What was in it the book? Oh, just a paragraph where she tries to warn Bill of the Hillary bisexuality rumors.
Which brings us to our next point; Hillary has been linked to Huma, in DC circles, as long time lesbian lovers. Could this plot thicken anymore? Or any worse?
“Huma has a choice to make,” an unnamed source said, to New York magazine. “Does she go with Anthony or does she go with Hillary?” This is the “biggest question among Hillary’s circle,” the magazine said, as the former first lady takes the stage as the Democratic Party’s most likely White House candidate for 2016.
Then if the final straw wasn’t enough, Weiner was asked recently if he had any insight into a potential role for his wife in the Hillary 2016 Presidential plans where he answered, “I do, but I’m not going to tell you.”
The Clinton camp, enraged at his answer, immediately responded Weiner knew nothing of any plans and that they were not amused by his comment indicating he did. Weiner responded that it was a joke. “Have you ever heard people say, ‘Yes, but if I tell you I’d have to kill you?’ It was a joke, everyone laughed, it was a joke. I’ll try to make the jokes more obvious.”
“The Clintons”, syndicated columnist Maureen Dowd writes, “are not happy about getting dragged into the lewd spectacle that is a low-budget movie version of their masterpiece.”
Hillary blamed Bill’s scandals on the “vast right wing conspiracy” and stood by her man. But when Bill had to come clean, she continued to stand by him; it’s a clause in their marriage vows, I assume, which includes a full section on long term political partnership for the greater good.
Hillary made the statement over and over; she was “committed to the marriage” but, when it comes to Huma, she apparently doesn’t have the same option if she wants to stay on board the 2016 Hillary Express to the White House.
In summary, Weiner sexts his junk to a couple of women. Bill, on the other hand, has parked his junk in any available space, likely even the no parking zone in front of the Plaza’s Latte Land.
Hillary has long been rumored to be bedding Weiners wife. But they don’t want to be compared to each other and Huma needs to make a choice; leave your dirt ball husband if you want to stay with the even bigger dirt ball couple.
I suppose the most accurate term would be “politics as usual.” Move along, everyone, nothing to see here.”