Joe Miller: Star Gazing @ 18th and Grand

A little more than 10 years ago, when I still bought into the notion of the honorable American newspaper, and there wasn’t yet a lot of talk about its eminent death, I traveled to Omaha for a journalism conference where I heard a reporter from the Kansas City Star named Mike McGraw say, “I love documents,” and my career instantly came into focus.

“I love studying them, skimming them, sifting through them,” he said, leaning comfortably against a podium in a hotel ballroom, in a voice of sincerity and wonder and ease.

And I understood, finally.

For four years I had worked at little daily and weekly papers in Colorado and Kansas and I’d been baffled by investigative journalism. I never knew what documents to ask for, or, when I did, I couldn’t figure out how to find stories in them.

McGraw, winner of the Pulitzer Prize for national reporting in 1992, told how he’d gained access to the file room of an agency he was investigating and, feeling overwhelmed by all the information that surrounded him, said to himself something like, “OK, what am I supposed to find here?” He looked up and saw a box that had PRIVATE JET written across it in magic marker. Months later, his five-part series hit the streets, forcing reforms in the agency and winning him the Polk Prize

As I sat in the audience listening I thought, I can do that.

And I did. Within a week after the conference, I got a tip that a company south of the town where I was working as a reporter for the daily newspaper was dumping toxins into the Kansas River, the main water supply for suburban Kansas City, and state regulators were doing nothing about it.

I requested access to the files, asked myself what I was supposed to find there, and skimmed and studied and sifted through the documents, and within a few weeks my story was on the front page of the Sunday paper. The next day, state bureaucrats were scrambling to shut the polluter down. And I went on to win a Kansas Press Association award for investigative reporting.

Back then, I fantasized all the time about ascending the ranks of newspaperdom, taking a job at a big-city daily like the Chicago Tribune, Washington Post or even Kansas City Star, and kicking some big-time corrupt government ass. Daily papers were like sports teams to me, their top reporters all-stars. My Super Bowl was in April, when the Pulitzers are announced.

But I couldn’t hack it. I never made it more than six months at a daily paper. The pace would grind me down, and I’d go running back to alternative weeklies where I had time to spin long yarns, and I could cover the daily paper like a sports reporter.

When I jumped from the little newspaper in Kansas, my final failure in daily journalism, it just so happened that I landed in Kansas City, right when a big Mike McGraw investigation was coming out. It was a multi-part story about how the Kemper Museum of Contemporary Art got duped into buying a collection of fake Georgia O’Keefe water colors.

He’d spent more than a year on it; I remembered him mentioning it during his talk in Omaha. The series promised an exposé of the seamy underworld of art collecting, but delivered 7,500 painfully boring words of “he said, she said,” with no gun, smoking or otherwise.

Very disappointing, but not as disappointing as McGraw’s output over the next several years, which was almost nil.

 

McGraw wrote just four stories over the next two years, half of them glorified obituaries.

The most bylines he posted in any year since I moved to Kansas City was 37, according to the paper’s online database, in 2005, when he and a couple of other reporters collaborated on an investigation of the city’s corrupt housing program.

A lot of the stories were short follow-ups on the original series, reports about the government’s response to the series, as if the paper unearthed the wrongdoing in the first place and spurred the government into action.

But I’d been around long enough to know that it was the other way around. The city’s auditor had teamed up with a special investigator from HUD to make a report that revealed virtually all of the problems the paper’s series reported. So they were playing catch up, really.

One our duties at The Pitch was to report on the daily paper. In those days, the dominant theme of our coverage of the Star was laziness. At our weekly editorial meetings, we would go on and on about how the paper of record was slacking, filing half-assed stories full of evenly apportioned quotes from both sides of issues that could easily be made definitive with a little gumshoe work. Or the stories they missed altogether.

We should’ve been happy about it. The Star’s lack was our fortune; we could write the stories they missed or underreported, and we could write about their negligence.

But we believed in the paper’s honorable imperative. We believed that the Star’s slothfulness threatened the order of things in our city and region, and provided opportunities for graft, and this was terribly unsettling, at least to me.

The whole notion of the Fourth Estate was as close as I got to religion in those days.

I was self righteous about it. I would scold the Star’s reporters about it when I’d bump into them at press conferences, like when I got on their City Hall reporter for not showing up at a luncheon attended by a quorum of City Council members. I reminded her about the Sunshine Law case the paper had pursued all the way to the state Supreme Court that had put an end to a tradition of closed-door meetings in city government.

“You have an obligation to go to these things,” I said, leaning in and pointing my finger at her.

She leered back at me, as if to say, “Who the fuck are you?”

A year or so after I moved to Kansas City, the Star offered an opportunity for select readers to come and tour their newsroom and printing plant, and to attend an editorial meeting, and help decide what would go on the front page of the next day’s edition. I signed up for it without disclosing that I was a reporter for the Pitch.

And I saw him. Mike McGraw, at a desk near a window in a far corner of the newsroom, wearing a tie, with his shirt sleeves rolled up, looking very much as though he was working, even though this was one of the years when his byline appeared only twice.

I wondered how a paper could have a Pulitzer Prize winner and never get any stories out of him.

I asked him what he was working on, but he just smiled and he wouldn’t tell me.

Years later, I’ve come to understand that by that juncture in McGraw’s career he was no longer a journalist. He had become a bureaucrat in a sluggish institution of power, no different than a City Hall lifer who has become skilled at taking an hour’s worth of work and stretching into an entire week.

And in doing so, he serves as a stark and true emblem of Kansas City’s paper of record.

This entry was posted in News_and_Views and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

8 Responses to Joe Miller: Star Gazing @ 18th and Grand

  1. chuck says:

    Easily your best…
    Very entertaining and it provides some insights for us hoi polloi.

    Read this, “When I jumped from the little newspaper in Kansas, my final failure in daily journalism, it just so happened that I landed in Kansas City…”.

    I’m not sure why a decision concerning what you want to do with your life, short and long term is a straight line reference to failure.

    I am thinking you drink as much as I do.

    Dispense with the lachrymose, maudlin bullshit, and have another drink.

    You don’t owe fuckin anybody anything, ever.

    Nice article, I like the Mike McGraw stuff, I had forgot all about him.

    At some point, we all get bored with our jobs, and it looks like Mike got pretty sick of delving into arcane, musty records for new laurels. Oh well, it is what it is, very human.

    Again, your hittin your stride on this one.

  2. HARLEY says:

    booorrrrrrrinnnnnnnngggggggg
    if you want to write a disertation teach at umkc. If you want to write about westport…hotties…baseball..
    football…..clubs…..hotties….movies…..bars……race relations you can stay on here.
    Otherwise you’re taking up precious space that could be taken by intellectual articles about
    black barbie…maureen…mermaid…bad ass….cliffy…wodside….glaze…..etc…
    in other words your “good ole days” article don’t belong here. Start you r own site…
    this one is starting to take off ……….nice article but its pretty boring. and it doesnt appeal
    to the interest of hearne’s readers

  3. Orphan of the Road says:

    Now
    you are getting somewhere Mr. Miller.

    Listen to Chuck, he knows of which he speaks.

  4. Mildred Pierce says:

    Chuck is right, Harley is wrong
    How the mighty have fallen: Harley grovels and drools for Mermaid, the lowest common denominator–
    while our Chuck slams in LACHRYMOSE! He spellchecks, he scores!!

    Harley, you pompous ass, this series is the Roadkill Distraction Adventure Hearne gave to us while he is in Tucson, don’t you read????

    Joe, this chapter of your swan song was much better. You didn’t even hardly kick yourself–maybe you’ve found that therapist? Actually, Chuck would make a fine therapist–he’s apparently been on the rollycoaster of life and come to accept it.

  5. Hearne says:

    Perhaps I can shed some light on the subject
    I knew Mike pretty well. More when I first came to the Star than in later years. We worked on an investigative story that we both believed should have been published by Zeiman and other Star editors chickened out. We worked on it hard, both of us, side-by-side.

    It had to do with two workers who died by inhaling fumes while refinishing squash and handball courts at the University Club. The question was, had the club been negligent in not allowing enough ventilation into the area where the men were working and what if any liability it had.

    You can imagine how their wives and families felt and how Mike and I felt in being very disappointed that our weeks of work went unpublished.

    All that said, Joe nailed this one. With rare exception Mike long ago settled into the role of a Tribal Elder. Likely making a healthy six-figure income – enough for at least two, maybe three reporters who would bring red meat to the table on a weekly basis. While writing about 20 and 30 (or longer) stories about firemen and murders that very few current day Kansas Citians have much if any interest in.

    For the record, he sitteth on the right hand of Mark Zeiman, so unless Mike chooses to do the honorable thing and retire (or maybe go back to work), chances are other heads will continue to role as the cutbacks and declines in readership continue to escalate.

  6. HEY PROFESSOR says:

    What’s funny about this is that McGraw has done more for journalism in this town than Hearne or Joe can ever hope to do.

    What’s funny about this is that McGraw has more integrity and flat-out brains that Joe can ever hope for.

    Joe’s about as jealous as Tony Botello, and unfortunately not quite as bright. “You couldn’t hack it” is right. You can barely hack life without a big bag of dope nearby.

    No one ever thought “who the fuck are you?” when they saw Joe Miller. They know why you are: a fucking nobody loser. Mike McGraw does more in a week than you can possibly aspire to accomplish in your lifetime.

    So smoke some more, asshole.

  7. Gerald Bostock says:

    The Albus Dumbledore of KC Star
    It is a simple economic question: In a time of shrinking revenue and news hole and fewer available bodies, it is defensible to pay a high salary to hold onto a talented and experienced, but aging reporting wizard who will turn out at best only a few stories a year? Especially if the editors are too timid to publish the articles he does produce? Papers used to have the luxury of having elite reporting teams detached from daily responsibilities and dedicated to the pursuit of journalism prizes. It would be especially hard for the Star to force McGraw out, because he won its most recent (and last?) Pulitzer, and Zieman knows he wouldn’t have been able to catapult himself into top management without McGraw’s efforts.
    In the meantime, this Joe Miller is an odd duck. He seems to have enough self-awareness to know he is a douchebag, but not enough character to stop being one.

  8. KCMonarch says:

    Just not the same without
    .

    9 + 5 = .

Comments are closed.