Tony: Taking On Gateway City D-bags And The K.C. Confidential Stat Controversy

It’s always a mistake to address anony Internet haters but the topic of K.C. Confidential’s stat success is worth addressing in as much as it points that people working in web media can’t really claim much expertise over the average millennial college student. Here’s the sitch:

The anony d-bags at the Gateway City message board are calling into question the validity of this blog’s stats by referencing their favorite lame online stat checking, traffic ranking sites.

To me, this kind of argument that rages among unemployed people fighting on the Internet is akin a discussion of how many angels can dance on the head of a pin. Still, busting myth-busting people who don’t know what they’re talking about is good fun. So let’s bring just a bit of light into the den of ignorance that is the Gateway City Radio message boards.

First, let’s start by acknowledging the overall weakness of the advertising model because that’s the only thing that makes web stats important – the ability to use them in order to garner advertising dollars. As the dead tree media moves completely online it’s important to realize that the same revenue structure does not apply. Put simply, web ads just don’t make as much money as print and that’s not going to change for a very long time. Maybe never. In fact, the New York Times has crunched the numbers and determined that web advertising simply won’t keep their news organization afloat.

Meanwhile, the Long Tail theory tells us that in a world of unlimited bandwidth there is a significant and sustainable niche out there for almost every blogger or Internet content purveyor. This means that there’ll be more competition, increasingly segmented audiences and simply less money to go around.

Yet, despite all this bad news people are still dishing out money for online advertising and K.C. Confidential has an impressive list of sponsors who are so successful that most of them are out of my price range. And what I’ve learned from Hearne in the short time that I’ve known him is that these folks running local businesses that would benefit from placement on a local niche site don’t have the time, will or inclination to do their homework when it comes to an accurate reading of webstats at somewhat reliable online sources like Quantcast, Compete or Alexa. They’re just not gonna ask for Google Analytics numbers. In turn, for an online publisher, the invasion of privacy just isn’t worth the few hundred dollars that a web advertising client is offering.

In my opinion, while this blog has pretty great stats it’s really Hearne’s reputation, personality and influence that sways his sponsors.

So, web stats, traffic ranking and other kinds of (mostly unreliable) online measures of popularity are mostly the domain of online jerks (like me), while people with money to spend at the local level rarely take time to understand the mostly pointless minutia for such a trivial investment.

Nevertheless, the staffers at this blog are surprisingly forthcoming when it comes to hard data and I was e-mailed a copy of a “money shot” which clearly demonstrates that this blog is averaging nearly 100k hits a day during the latest traffic spike in November that I think in part had something to do Greg Hall’s great sports writing and Hearne’s scoop on former KU football coach Mark Magino’s big ass. Here’s a look at the stats that come directly from WordPress:

In the final analysis, the charts or one stat measuring one site vs. another isn’t going to convince online anony haters . . . But that’s okay because they’re not important. On my blog, TKC, I’m rewarded by e-mails, great online debates among hundreds of people everyday and conversations with some of the most politically connected folks in Kansas City. Here at KCC it’s obvious that Hearne knows nearly EVERYONE in this cowtown and his connections have garnered an impressive Facebook following of more than 2,000 people, the six-figure hit count we were just discussing and a long list of advertisers. Contrastingly, online haters have only their wits and a lot of free time due to chronic unemployment. So, while there is no “winning” this argument I think it’s important for denizens of the Internet to understand that life is not fair. The brilliance of an online annony d-bag almost always goes unrewarded, while folks, like Hearne, who hustle are able to do garner advertisers and a growing audience. Heck, even seldom-visited sites I’ve never heard of like are pulling down impressive client lists. Online stat geeks can cry foul but the fact of the matter is, when it comes to local niche content there’s still no accurate web measure for INFLUENCE which is a rare item in both the digital and real world, and it’s something that is completely lacking in anony online complainers busy counting other people’s stats and money.

Tony Botello

This entry was posted in Tony_Botello and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

7 Responses to Tony: Taking On Gateway City D-bags And The K.C. Confidential Stat Controversy

  1. Anonymous says:

    You rail against the kc star and qoute mis
    reperesentation about their circulation stats.
    Now, we catch you lying about something that
    you constantly pound the kc star for.
    The stat chart you have seems fishy. Where did
    that come from because it is totally 1000% different than anything I’ve seen.
    There’s no site name/no quantification/no
    other info. I belive that this is a bold
    face lie on hearnes part.
    Tell me where the stats come from. Tell me where
    I can go to verify those stats. There are 4
    industry approved sites that point out that
    Hearne liedabout those numbers.
    Have your internet agency go to google analytics
    and pull the numbers from there….and post
    them on the site.
    You and hearne scorn others for lying and
    misreperesentation. Now I am challenging you
    to prove your stats.
    You say their not important. Tell any major
    daily paper that their circulation stats arent
    importatn. Tell any radio or tv stations the
    viewer/listener rating are not important.
    Hearne lied and thus many people are now starting to doubt anything he says is true.
    that phony graph there is not authentic.
    Google analytics is the only place to
    verify the numbers.
    bY THE WAY ….you are always referencing
    unemployed people…where are these people
    and why are they unemployed?
    IS A LIE.

  2. Anonymous says:

    tony…even though i caught hearne lying
    i did think your coverage on your site
    about the kc snow storm was excellent.
    keep up the good work..
    its not long before funkhouser moves out
    of city hall…but its not soon enough.

  3. Anonymous says:

    100,000 is a big number for a day? Half that number would be huge.

  4. Anonymous says:

    FYI: If Jojo had half a clue, he would know that site providers keep counts and make them available to clients. So there’s no need to employ outside-looking in guesstimates that vary in accuracy, as Tony has pointed out. Just like any Internet site holder, we get the real deal numbers. And trust me, they have grown substantially. No need to lie, because my hope is they will increase dramatically over time. As they have to date.
    In March, for example, KCC totaled 1,039,873 total hits for a seven day average of 33,544 per day. As of yesterday – and this is a slow holiday month – we were at 2,707,177 for the month, which looks to be down a bit from November.
    There you have it!

  5. Anonymous says:

    Yeah Hearne but 700,000 of those are Jojo. Seriously. I don’t want so much info my head explodes. But pretend for a moment I’m an advertiser. Some things I would want to know is how much is repeat, what are the demographics, which are peaks times for hits, etc. Is this type of information available to you?

  6. Anonymous says:

    So tired of the little patting each other on the back, circle jerk ‘news’ that you guys just keep posting about each other.

  7. Anonymous says:

    jojo’s wife
    Ahh…ohhh…..Yes….more… are such a BIG man. FYI-I’m deceivbing you. I HATE holidays when we get no mail SERVICE 😉

Comments are closed.